•  
  •  
 
Teacher Education Journal of South Carolina

Abstract

Considering upgrades and changes in seating and physical design within the college classroom is often challenging in higher education. When designing a dedicated learning space at the university level, collaboration areas with flexible seating options should be considered a priority (Hare & Dillon, 2016). According to Burgeson (2017), providing flexible seating options K-12 within a student-centered approach to teaching and learning increases student engagement when given the choice of seating options. The researchers wondered if that would be true for college-level students and designed an action research study to understand this phenomenon. Student choice and voice were critical elements of the classroom design, and this study was conducted to validate seven flexible seating options. The goal of the classroom design and research was to create a physical environment where participants were exposed to various flexible seating options and allowed to explore each one over time. The questions studied were: Would the choice of flexible seating impact student engagement and comfort, and would seating options favor or benefit college students? Although the students spoke of the value of the variety of seating choices regarding comfort and engagement, only three were self-selected regularly: the traditional chair, the high-top seating, and the seat cushion. A notable finding was how an improved physical learning environment could contribute to a more equitable and inclusive education for all students. In addition, students detailed that higher comfort only sometimes led to higher engagement.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.