Date of Award
Spring 2026
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Science (BS)
Department
Marine Science
College
College of Science
First Advisor
Erin E. Hackett
Abstract/Description
The marine atmospheric surface layer (MASL), defined as the lowest ~100 m of the atmosphere overlying the ocean, is a complicated environment influenced by air-sea interactions and regional weather patterns. In the absence of air motion, air pressure in the MASL decreases with altitude at a constant rate due to the reduction in weight of the overlying air column. This relationship is defined by a linear hydrostatic equation and is applied under the assumption that any dynamic vertical pressure gradients will be small relative to the hydrostatic pressure gradient. The hydrostatic assumption is commonly applied in the MASL despite the complex dynamics in this region that could cause pressure to deviate from hydrostatic. It is prudent to revisit the hydrostatic assumption, especially as it pertains to new technologies with higher spatiotemporal resolution whose accuracy may be sensitive to even small deviations from hydrostatic pressure. This study compares vertical atmospheric pressure profiles to those based on the hydrostatic assumption at a standardized air density. This evaluation is conducted using verified non-hydrostatic numerical weather prediction forecasts and in-situ data within the MASL. Pressure residuals between the hydrostatic-modeled pressures and data pressures are evaluated. Vertical atmospheric pressure gradients are estimated, and percent deviations from a hydrostatic pressure gradient are computed and compared across latitudes and seasons. These deviations are used to evaluate their impact on calculated atmospheric refractivity and its vertical gradient to assess the sensitivity of derived quantities, which are relevant to novel technologies (Hackett et al., 2025), to the hydrostatic assumption. Results from all datasets show that pressure gradient deviations are relatively small. The largest deviations occur at low latitudes and during frontal passages. Error in refractivity due to deviations from hydrostatic pressure is generally small, except where there are very small refractive gradients.
Recommended Citation
Griffin, Karina, "Revisiting the Hydrostatic Assumption in the Marine Atmospheric Surface Layer" (2026). Honors Theses. 541.
https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/honors-theses/541